In view of the world as we find it, anyone could be excused for being suspicious about politicians (such as Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni) talking about civilization. After all, what is that?
Well, the Cambridge or Merriam-Webster dictionaries offer definitions which boil down to either complex social and technical organization or to particular cultures. Until recently few objected to identifying empires with civilizations (that covered everyone's empires, so Mayans or Incas counted just as well as Europeans), probably on the assumption that empires would be better organised.
But the questions follow: How much connection does civilization have with being civilized or civility? On Good Friday (variable date) we celebrate a crucifixion, which in the Roman system (civilization) was normally reserved for slaves. Can the Resurrection serve as a symbol for decolonisation?
What range does civilization allow for members to dispute with one another? Could a spat between American universities and the Trump administration be included when both sides display little respect for law?
Is barbarism or barbarity a real contrast to civilization? Both ancient and modern examples of organization include wars, genocides, persecutions, etc. Are those barbaric only if disorganised?
Again, what relevance do artefacts have for civilization? Can we rely on artists, or even technicians and philosophers, to show us what is civilised or uncivilised? Are propaganda symbols a mark of civilization?
Just asking questions.